Finally, some good news on the foreign affairs front. Even skeptic liberals can't help feeling surprisingly optimistic after the apparent success of the Iraqi vote this past weekend. Early vote estimates show upwards of 60% of registered voters braving the violence to go out to the polls. Beyond anything else, this seems to really prove that there is indeed a "silent majority" in Iraq that wants Democracy and indirectly appreciates the U.S.'s efforts (albeit with mistakes along the way) to aid in the overthrow of tyranny.
For Wilsonians and neo-cons alike, this vote is the real expression of all the theory that we heard in Bush's inuagural speech last week. Of course, it is important not to get too carried away here. Much remains to be done. But this vote is a hugely important first step for putting Iraq back together. It also vindicates those, including Tom Friedman, who argued for this vote to take place on its scheduled date despite ongoing violence. Now, no matter how much bloodshed the insurgents continue to inflict, the world knows that the Iraqi people as a whole are dedicated to the rebuilding of their country as a new beacon of real Democracy in the Middle East.
Another important lesson should be drawn from Iraq--one that might help improve our own Democracy here in America. When 60% of courageous Iraqi's go out and vote on election day knowing that they could be walking to their death, we here in the U.S. have absolutely no excuse for poor turnout in our own elections. This first Iraqi election matched the U.S. turnout for the recent 2004 election--turnout that was at its highest point since the 1970's. Americans take Democracy for granted. It is ironic that Iraqis could teach us a lesson about appreciating our own liberties while we are the ones claiming to be the radiating light for free society in the world.
Before finishing, I guess I should update my loyal blog-readers about my law school admissions status. So far, so good. I'm 3/3 but still really hoping for a school like Vandy to come through for me. In order of my preferences:
- Columbia: pending
- UVA: pending
- Duke: pending
- Vandy: pending
- George Washington: accepted!
- Emory: accepted!
- WashU: pending
- William and Mary: pending
- UGA: accepted!
- Wake Forest: pending
I have to agree that the election turned out better than I think anyone could have expected. The high turnout rate is a true testiment to how badly the Iraqi people truly want a free and democratic society.
However, it is important to remember that elections are only the first of many steps to creating a truly consolidated democracy. As Tom Friedman said last night on Hardball, the key will be to see if the next election goes as smoothly as the first. It is an unfortunate reality that many new democracies make it through their first election only to end up with a regime that uses the election as a legitimizing tool but refuses to transfer power over to anyone else.
I say this not to be pessimistic, but rather as a reminder that just because elections have taken place does not mean we are anywhere near to declaring victory. There is still a great deal to be done and it is essential that we not pull out of Iraq too early. Hopefully, the incredible success of these elections will encourage everyone all around the world that no matter what they thought about the war, the focus now should be on the future and consolidating a strong democratic government in Iraq.
Posted by: Dave | Tuesday, February 01, 2005 at 12:19 PM