Gas tax advocates have argued feverishly for a strict gas tax as a blunt method to quickly curb America's addiction to oil. They see the tax essentially as a disincentive to buy and drive gas-guzzling cars. But like all sin taxes, the government likewise enjoys the hefty revenue intake when people decide to swallow the costs and maintain their supposedly illicit behavior. An article in yesterday's Times looked at what might happen when gas taxes accomplish the first goal of minimizing gasoline usage in the country.
In Oregon, a state with many clean air and "clean car" programs, the expected reduction in gasoline use could take a significant toll on the state's treasury. As many know, most states already have a gas tax, albeit usually a small toll around 20-30 cents/gallon. The proceeds go almost exclusively to building and maintaining the ubiquitous highway systems that pervade today's landscape. Unfortunately, as gasoline usage begins to subside, states are going to find themselves strapped for money to keep up with the inevitable maintenance of all that asphalt.
As the article explains, Oregon is experimenting with an alternative to the gas tax to address these concerns. The alternative is essentially a vehicle-mounted GPS system that tracks miles traveled, where traveled, and during what time of the day. The idea, in the long-run, is to tax miles driven at different rates depending on the time of the day or location.
While I am a strong proponent of breaking this country's oil addiction, my hopes for the future extend beyond mere environmental concerns. More than anything, I still hope that the rise in oil costs will change the direction of future development and land use from a car-oriented strategy to a transit and pedestrian friendly system. However, the more likely scenario is that new technology such as hybrid or hydrogen-powered vehicles will prevent a reduction of Americans' dependence on cars in the coming years.
Apparently, Oregon foresees this same possibility. If our need for roads and highways remains high, but state revenue from gasoline taxes falls, something like a per-mile tax will have to be instituted. The idea is still in its formative stages, but it is certainly something that could come to fruition fairly soon.
The conclusion of this article introduced a number of privacy concerns that such a system would create. The lawyers seem to be getting excited about the thought already. I'm sure such concerns could be addressed, but it might be fun to be in the middle of something like that...
Recent Comments