Much has been made of the New England Patriots' ridiculous 8-0 start to the 2007 NFL season. The Patriots aren't just winning easy, they're pounding teams into brutal submission (41.4pts scored/game and only 16pts allowed/game). Unfortunately, the Patriots, like any hegemon, have begun to incite a significant amount of resentment among players and fans of the NFL. This week's 52-7 demolishing of the Redskins only added fuel to the fire.
The most controversial play involved the Patriots opting to "go for it" on 4th an 1 in the 4th quarter when the score was already 38-0. Tom Brady converted the 4th down on a QB keeper, and the Pats went on to score twice more, driving the score up to an absurd 52-0.
Joe Gibbs, the Redskins Coach, decided to take the high ground and refused to openly complain about the apparent disrespect that many saw in the Patriots' late-game tactics. In a league where injuries and freak turnovers can change a team's fortunes on a weekly basis, most coaches know not to push their luck when things are going well.
More directly, though, what sense does it make to have Tom Brady and the rest of the starting lineup out on the field with your team up 38-0 in the 4th quarter? What good can come of such a decision? Last week, Brady's backup came in late in the game and promptly threw an interception for a TD -- bluntly indicating the difference a good QB makes, even for the mighty Patriots. Does anyone doubt that this team would become everyone's favorite punching bag were an angry and resentful lineman to "accidentally" fall on Brady's knee in the 4th quarter of an upcoming (and inevitable) rout?
Apparently, Bill Belichik is willing to take such a risk in order to inflict a pointless embarrassment on his opponents. If I were a fan of the Patriots, I'd be a little bit concerned that my coach was less interested in the future of the team than in another obligatory touchdown in a week 8 blowout.
Recent Comments